U.S. schoolchildren now subjected to sack lunch searches by government agents who enforce nutritional insanity


U.S. schoolchildren now subjected to sack lunch searches by government agents who enforce nutritional insanity

via U.S. schoolchildren now subjected to sack lunch searches by government agents who enforce nutritional insanity.

This is utterly ridiculous! Exactly what are they trying or expecting to find in the children’s sack lunches prepared for them in most cases, by their parents or families? In my opinion, this is huge waste of tax payers money and invasion of the children’s privacy! They claim that next they will be actually going into the homes of the children and inspecting the food in their homes! What is this all about?

(NaturalNews) First it was the TSA searching your underpants at the airport, claiming to be protecting you from “terrorists.” Now a local elementary school in North Carolina is searching the homemade lunches of schoolchildren with the goal of forcing children to ditch their nutritious, home-made meals and learn to consume pasteurized, homogenized USDA-approved cow’s milk and chemically-laced processed meats that promote cancer.

This is what happened, as reported in the Carolina Journal yesterday:

“A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because a state employee told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious.” (http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/homemade-lunch-replaced-wit…)

The paper goes on to report:

“The girl’s turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the agent who was inspecting all lunch boxes in her More at Four classroom that day.”

Hold on a sec there, partner. There are AGENTS inspecting lunch boxes of schoolchildren?

You thought the TSA was bad? Get ready for school lunch pat-downs!

That’s the first highly disturbing part of this entire story. See, the corrupt state is trying to take over everything, including the American family. Telling little Johnny that his mom packed an “inferior” lunch is one way of teaching children that they should worship the state instead of their parents. It’s entirely consistent with the actions of pathetic child health sellouts such as California Governor Jerry Brown who recently signed a law giving 12-year-old children the right to “consent” to being injected with Gardasil vaccines as long as they don’t tell their parents. (http://www.naturalnews.com/033831_Jerry_Brown_Gardasil.html)

Parents are useless. The state is God. Write that down, boys and girls, as you’ll be tested on it later. And please don’t tell all the TSA perverts that new jobs are opening up involving searching the sacks of elementary schoolchildren, or they’ll quit the TSA in droves and line up to be part of anything that might involve touching little children (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=979D7B9F44BA6EAE0DF65B3DE6E4EE33).

In North Carolina, the homemade school lunches that don’t meet USDA guidelines are then “enhanced” with what the state calls the “missing items” (the processed meat laced with chemicals, or the dead, pasteurized milk, produced with Bovine Growth Hormones). Parents are then billed (fined) for the additional cost of these “missing” items.

In other words, the state is forcing parents to buy cancer-causing processed foods and feed them to their children!

“What got me so mad,” said the girl’s mother, as reported in CarolinaJournal.com, “…is, number one, don’t tell my kid I’m not packing her lunch box properly. I pack her lunchbox according to what she eats. It always consists of a fruit. It never consists of a vegetable. She eats vegetables at home because I have to watch her because she doesn’t really care for vegetables.” (http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/homemade-lunch-replaced-wit…)

But the other truly disturbing part about all this is that the “official” USDA-approved nutritional requirements for children are nothing more than a total sellout to the corrupt dairy industry! Here, drink pasteurized, homogenized, hormone-produced milk which will probably make the girls hit puberty at age 9 while causing the little boys to grow armpit hair before they’re old enough to tie their own shoelaces.

Ditch your healthy food and eat this homogenized crap!

So the girl brought to school a turkey and cheese sandwich, a banana, some potato chips and some apple juice. Admittedly, it’s not the lunch of champions or anything, but guess what the school forced her to eat instead? Chicken nuggets.

Yeah, those are the deep-fried “parts is parts” chicken-like objects made from mechanically-separated chicken (yuck). They probably contain MSG or some other taste-enhancing chemical, too, and they’re no doubt fried in genetically-modified soy oil or corn oil. That must be very conducive to a learning environment, huh?

And this elementary school’s current home page features a giant photo of children holding up signs that read, “HELP FIGHT HEART DISEASE.” (http://whes.hcs.k12.nc.us/) Seriously? Do they honestly think feeding chicken nuggets to preschoolers is an intelligent way to fight heart disease? (Dear God, what has public education come to in America?)

Since when was the state any kind of authority on nutrition anyway?

All this takes a lot of gall for a government that routinely formulates the most nutritionally-depleted school lunch programs and prison food imaginable. If the government was in charge of our nutrition, we’d all be eating genetically modified poison laced with pharmaceuticals and birth control. It’s almost like Bill Gates’ heavenly recipe for “feeding the world,” huh?

Eat this and die. That’s what the government’s pushing these days. After all, the sooner you all die, the more money the government will save on social security, Medicare and other entitlements it can’t afford to pay for much longer. I bet that’s one social science lesson these kids aren’t taught in school. You’re more valuable to the state dead than alive.

The government likes to act like it’s all “official” or something, and that it’s somehow looking out for the welfare of these children. It was the Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services which enforced these loony requirements. According to all those “officials” (i.e. government nutritional morons who eat junk food all day while sitting at their desks and injecting themselves with insulin all day), a “healthy” meal for a child should consist of:

• One serving of meat, such as sausages laced with cancer-causing sodium nitrite, which is linked to a 300% increase in brain tumors in children and a 67% increase in pancreatic cancer (http://www.naturalnews.com/007133.html).

• One serving of pasteurized, homogenized, heart-disease inducing cow’s milk which also causes allergies, autoimmune disorders and digestive problems.

• One serving of grain, which could be met by serving some nutritionally-depleted white bread.

• Two servings of fruit or vegetables, including those gross canned peaches floating in corn syrup.

Yep! That’s the USDA’s pathetic definition of nutrition, folks. A bunch of disease-inducing processed dead food that’s sanctioned by the very same state that wants a dead population. So it all makes sense, you see.

God forbid the mom that packs a lunch for her child that looks something like this:

• A fresh sprout salad (state officials have never seen living sprouts and would probably condemn them as being too “alive” to be safely consumed. Irradiate it!).

• A fresh avocado sprinkled with paprika and nutritional yeast (huh? Is that a fruit? A vegetable? What does it count for? This would confuse school officials for weeks who would have to convene a committee to study the issue…)

• An egg sandwich made from free-range chicken eggs, served up on gluten-free whole grain English muffins (what? No meat! You are murdering your child, you careless parents! Call Child Protective Services!)

• A bottle of fresh juice made that morning from oranges, carrots, lemons and a hint of ginger. (LIVING food? That’s the food of terrorists! Nothing alive is allowed in the schools! Forbidden!)

You see, school officials wouldn’t recognize a nutritious lunch of it slapped them across the face. There’s nothing quite like being cold-cocked with an egg-and-tomato sprout sandwich.

Instead, these pathetic state “health department” enforcers apparently ended their own nutritional education with health class in high school, which gives you even less education than the innate knowledge of a typical mule, because at least the mule knows to eat the living grass and flowers growing right out of the soil. Yep, I said it: These state officials know less than an ass about nutrition.

Coming next: Government agents inspecting children’s meals IN YOUR HOME

But where is this school lunch inspection behavior really heading? Well, since the state loves your children so much, and since it is now the full responsibility of the state to care for your children, vaccinate them, feed them and program their brains with false U.S. history, the next step is government food agents conducting door-to-door surprise inspections at your house!

There’s a knock on the door. You foolishly answer it, only to find three trendy government agents with fake smiles plastered on their faces, flashing their badges. “We’re from the health department, and we’re here to inspect your refrigerator. You have children here, correct?”

The next thing you know, they discovered a sprouting machine on your countertop and your stash of raw milk hidden away in the back of the fridge. “Looks like we got ourselves a food terrorist here!” one of the agents mutters to the other. “Call in CPS! And the SWAT team!”

A few minutes later, you’re face down in the dirt in your own front yard, where the local city council fined you for trying to grow tomatoes, by the way (http://www.naturalnews.com/032960_Julie_Bass_home_gardening.html). Health department thugs are grinding a knee into your lower back, and one of them leans in to whisper into your ear: “You think those are YOUR children? WE are their parents now, get it? And we control what they eat and what medicine they get from now on.”

One of them cracks the back of your head with the butt of his government-issue rifle, slapping your nose into the soil as a sharp reminder. “And don’t make us come back, or we’ll have to take your little Johnny away and make him disappear into our world, where there are at least a dozen sexually frustrated agents who are looking for fresh meat, so to speak. Because meat is a USDA requirement, get it?”

That’s what could soon be coming your way in America — a nation that’s beginning to resemble North Korea in its total abandonment of human rights and human decency.

When schools denounce the role of parents in feeding their own children — and when doctors denounce the role of parents in making health care decisions for their own children — we aren’t too far away from the total state-run takeover of parenting.

Worship the state; surrender your children to total sterilization

You think it’s a coincidence that the health department wants your children to eat GMO food that’s chemically contaminated with brain-damaging excitotoxins? Of course not: The state wants to, at minimum, make your children sterile. If all the toxic GMOs and food chemicals happen to give them cancer or some other chronic disease in the mean time, that’s just a bonus dividend paid out by the pharmaceutical industry for all its profiteering on human suffering.

And hey, if your kid actually dies from all the poisonous food, the deadly vaccines, or the radiation fallout from all the deteriorating nuclear power plants across the country, that’s just a bonus for Bill Gates who factors it into his depopulation equation: P = P – 1 , where P = Population. Your kid is the “minus one” part of that calculation.

Of course, that’s good for the planet, right? So you should be happy to sacrifice your children to the state, as long as their early death brings down CO2 emissions. Just how much carbon dioxide does a pair of tiny lungs generate with its last dying breath, anyway? It gives a whole new meaning to the “depart” segment of the phrase “Health DEPARTment.”

That’s the point of the Health Department, you see: To make you depart from this world by destroying your health first.

The point is that as long as you follow the USDA, follow the Health Department, and submit to the new “food police” agents conducting random sack searches (and no, I don’t mean the TSA again) then you’ll get along just fine with the status quo. The government worshippers. The trendy statists who think it takes a village of government agents to raise a child.

It’s not enough to raise Amish raw milk farmers at gunpoint, you see, or for the government to destroy $50,000 worth of raw wholesome milk that was about to fed to hungry infants and babies (http://www.naturalnews.com/033220_Rawesome_Foods_armed_raids.html). In order to completely crush all remaining shards of liberty and drive the stake of total tyranny through the American family, the government has to punish nutritional non-conformity. Any parent who attempts to pack a school lunch that does not contain processed cancer-causing meat and pasteurized dead cow’s milk shall be punished, blamed and publicly humiliated.

Down with nutrition! Conformity is safety! Obedience is freedom! Chant that mantra of oppression fifty times until you start believe it, and then stop homeschooling your children and send them off to be de-educated in public schools, where both their minds and their bodies are poisoned on a daily basis so that they can grow up to become reporters for CNN.

Bow down before your new God, the all-powerful, all-seeing, all-spying Government. We are your parents now, little children. Worship us and you will be rewarded with coupons and trinkets. We may even give you an iPhone if you take enough vaccines without telling your parents. Shhhh!

Let your voice be heard

The school that allowed this “food police” activity to take place is the West Hoke Elementary School in Raeford, North Carolina. Its web page is:
http://whes.hcs.k12.nc.us/

The school’s slogan is: West Hoke Elementary School commits to promoting education by providing an environment conducive to learning.

Really? I guess nutrition doesn’t play any role in that learning “environment.” Forcing little children to eat processed chicken nuggets and pasteurized, homogenized, dead cow’s milk that’s filled with pus (yes, that’s true) isn’t much of a commitment to learning, is it now?

The principal of this school is Jackie Samuels. He is not the bad guy here and may not have even been aware this was going on. It was the state officials who conducted this food police activity at the school, not the school administrators.

The phone number of the school is: 910-875-2584

If you do contact this school or its principal Jackie Samuels, please be polite. Don’t go all crazy on ’em. Remember: Teaching is a very tough job, and most teachers are dedicated professionals who genuinely want to help. My beef is with the state officials who conducted these sack lunch searches, not the elementary school staff. Just let principal Samuels know that you don’t approve of them allowing government food police use their school as a “food police checkpoint” that only indoctrinates little children into learning obedience to the growing police state.

After all, elementary school is a place of learning. But WHAT are the kids learning if the school teaches them it’s okay for government agents to deny them their own lunches and force them to eat processed toxic food instead? The message is clear: Your parents are bad! Government is God! Worship the state, or you will be punished.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034979_food_police_sack_lunches_schoolchildren.html#ixzz1mT7uvxpj

Advertisements

War Crimes Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime, but committing war crimes is fine


War Crimes Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime, but committing war crimes is fine.

Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime,
but committing war crimes is fine

 

Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

 

 

 

 

Ex-C.I.A. Officer Charged in Information Leak

 

 

New York Times

The prosecution of Mr. Kiriakou is the sixth criminal case brought under President Obama against current or former government officials accused of providing classified information to the media, more such cases than all previous presidents combined. The crackdown, long sought by the C.I.A. and other agencies, has won the administration some credit with security officials angered by the president’s earlier decision to release classified legal opinions on the agency’s interrogation program.

Officials have said the administration’s campaign against leaks has resulted from a belief among the intelligence agencies and members of both parties in Congress that unauthorized disclosures by government employees holding security clearances were out of control. But Mr. Obama entered office pledging unprecedented transparency for government operations, and his record has drawn fire from civil libertarians and groups supporting whistle-blowers and press freedoms.

Among other things, the F.B.I. complaint accuses Mr. Kiriakou of being a source for a June 2008 front-page Times article, written by reporter Scott Shane. It identified a C.I.A. employee, Deuce Martinez, who played a major role interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, believed to have handled logistics for Al Qaeda, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Robert Christie, a spokesman for The Times, declined to comment.

The case is the second against a former C.I.A. officer for allegedly disclosing classified information to reporters within the past year. In 2011, Jeffrey Sterling, a former agency employee, was charged with leaking information allegedly used by James Risen, a Times reporter, in his 2006 book, “State of War.” (That case may be collapsing due to a judge’s ruling barring two witnesses from testifying; the prosecution has appealed.)

In a statement on Monday warning C.I.A. employees not to leak information, the C.I.A. director, David H. Petraeus, took note of both cases, saying that the agency “fully supported the investigation from the beginning and will continue to do so.”

The agency had initially pressed for an investigation of the Guantánamo detainee lawyers — not of its own former employee. The inquiry traces back to the spring of 2009, after government officials learned that Guantánamo defense lawyers were trying to identify C.I.A. interrogators — including the discovery of 32 pages of photographs in the cells of several Guantánamo detainees. The photos were a line-up of random people and suspected interrogators; the attorneys were trying to identify potential witnesses who could testify about abusive treatment, as mitigating evidence against death sentences.

That discovery led to an uproar within the C.I.A., where critics feared the move could put officials involved in the interrogation program at risk. The agency pressed for a criminal investigation, and Mr. Holder eventually appointed Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a United States attorney who led a high-profile C.I.A. leak investigation during the Bush administration, to handle it.

Entire article here

 

 

 

For more War Crimes videos, click here

 

See the complete catalog of
brasscheck tv videos

About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact

The bogus drug war Introducing Incarcerex ℞: Helping politicians maintain long lasting election results


]The bogus drug war Introducing Incarcerex ℞: Helping politicians maintain long lasting election results.

This is THE must see cartoon video! No wonder Congress, politicians,  Big Pharma and the rest are increasingly trying to sensor the internet. With simple but yet brilliant little cartoon’s like this, who the hell needs Elmer Fud and that pesky wabbit!

Introducing Incarcerex ℞: Helping politicians
maintain long lasting election results

 

 

Active duty cop:
‘The war on drugs is a war on people’

 

 

Raw Story

Speaking to Raw Story recently, an active duty police officer who asked not to be named threw down the gauntlet over the part of his job he hates most: the drug war.

“I did not get in law enforcement to destroy a person’s future because that person had marijuana or a pill in their pocket,” the officer explained. “Why would you want to destroy that person’s future and cause them great harm because of that? It’s not worth it.”

Like many Americans, the reality of the drug war was was nothing like what he’d been taught to believe in his youth. But statistics like a citizen being arrested for drugs every 19 seconds in 2010, and 1.6 million people incarcerated over drugs in 2009, were nothing compared to what he actually experienced in the front lines of the drug war on America’s users.

But for those officers who put their lives on the line every day to protect the public from dangerous, violent criminals, the drug war isn’t always just another part of the job. For this officer in particular, it’s much more than that: “The war on drugs is a war on people,” he claimed.

“I just didn’t see problems from illegal drug users that I’d been led to believe,” the officer explained. “Most of the calls that we get on drug use, as police, are alcohol related. Alcohol is a serious drug that can be abused, but I just didn’t see the calls on other drugs like I had been led to believe. I didn’t see these drug-crazed people out there doing crazy things… Even growing up before entering law enforcement, I was always led to believe that the drug war was meant to stop all these people from doing crazy things. But on the street, that’s not what you see. That’s a lie.”

In his view, the officer said that the American public would be much better off if the government would “regulate drugs and keep the control out of the hands of the black market criminals.”

“The cartels have been running a serious drug operation in America for decades, and I don’t think most Americans are really aware of it,” he said. “The money comes from the prohibition of drugs. These criminals are making their money because of the prohibition. If you legalize and regulate it, their profits go to zero.”

For more than two decades in law enforcement, he said that he’s carried an immense guilt: his first drug arrest.

“I was in training, on ‘the other side of the tracks,’ for lack of better words, and we pulled a vehicle over,” he explained. “The guy, I think he had a defective taillight or something. He was sober, polite, respectful, no problems, and my training officer said, ‘Oh yeah, he’s gonna have drugs.’ So, I asked if we could search his vehicle and he gave me permission. Within no time, I found a small amount of (hard) drugs, so he was facing a serious charge. The whole time I was thinking, ‘This is not right. This guy’s keeping to himself, not hurting nobody, he’s a peaceful person.’ I instinctively knew this was wrong. I changed my perspective immediately. This was not the war on drugs that I thought it would be.”

 

Read more here

 

 

 

For more The bogus drug war videos, click here

 

See the complete catalog of
brasscheck tv videos

About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact

Government corruption Government Sanctioned Theft


Government corruption Government Sanctioned Theft.

This is outright theft and completely wrong! I want to know who introduced this bill, who voted for it and why the president allowed it to happen. How does something like this make it’s way through congress? Who thought this was a good idea to make it legal for local law inforcement to just walk in and take what they want? And if ever there was an opportunity for our police officers and courts to take advantage of people and create situations to do so, this would have to be the one! In my opinion, this law must be reversed immediately and every instance where this law has been exercised should be reviewed for validity and accuracy.