War Crimes Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime, but committing war crimes is fine


War Crimes Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime, but committing war crimes is fine.

Blowing the whistle on war crimes is a crime,
but committing war crimes is fine

 

Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

 

 

 

 

Ex-C.I.A. Officer Charged in Information Leak

 

 

New York Times

The prosecution of Mr. Kiriakou is the sixth criminal case brought under President Obama against current or former government officials accused of providing classified information to the media, more such cases than all previous presidents combined. The crackdown, long sought by the C.I.A. and other agencies, has won the administration some credit with security officials angered by the president’s earlier decision to release classified legal opinions on the agency’s interrogation program.

Officials have said the administration’s campaign against leaks has resulted from a belief among the intelligence agencies and members of both parties in Congress that unauthorized disclosures by government employees holding security clearances were out of control. But Mr. Obama entered office pledging unprecedented transparency for government operations, and his record has drawn fire from civil libertarians and groups supporting whistle-blowers and press freedoms.

Among other things, the F.B.I. complaint accuses Mr. Kiriakou of being a source for a June 2008 front-page Times article, written by reporter Scott Shane. It identified a C.I.A. employee, Deuce Martinez, who played a major role interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, believed to have handled logistics for Al Qaeda, and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Robert Christie, a spokesman for The Times, declined to comment.

The case is the second against a former C.I.A. officer for allegedly disclosing classified information to reporters within the past year. In 2011, Jeffrey Sterling, a former agency employee, was charged with leaking information allegedly used by James Risen, a Times reporter, in his 2006 book, “State of War.” (That case may be collapsing due to a judge’s ruling barring two witnesses from testifying; the prosecution has appealed.)

In a statement on Monday warning C.I.A. employees not to leak information, the C.I.A. director, David H. Petraeus, took note of both cases, saying that the agency “fully supported the investigation from the beginning and will continue to do so.”

The agency had initially pressed for an investigation of the Guantánamo detainee lawyers — not of its own former employee. The inquiry traces back to the spring of 2009, after government officials learned that Guantánamo defense lawyers were trying to identify C.I.A. interrogators — including the discovery of 32 pages of photographs in the cells of several Guantánamo detainees. The photos were a line-up of random people and suspected interrogators; the attorneys were trying to identify potential witnesses who could testify about abusive treatment, as mitigating evidence against death sentences.

That discovery led to an uproar within the C.I.A., where critics feared the move could put officials involved in the interrogation program at risk. The agency pressed for a criminal investigation, and Mr. Holder eventually appointed Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a United States attorney who led a high-profile C.I.A. leak investigation during the Bush administration, to handle it.

Entire article here

 

 

 

For more War Crimes videos, click here

 

See the complete catalog of
brasscheck tv videos

About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact

Advertisements

Health and Medical The Dangers of Aspartame


Health and Medical The Dangers of Aspartame.

As with many products approved by the FDA, Aspartame is not safe for human consumption and causes an assortment of health related problems. Aspartame or NurtaSweet can be found in as many as 6000 products on the shelves of your local grocery stores. Soft drinks, cookies, jello pudding, hot chocolate, chewing gum, table top sweeter, cereal, ice cream, breath ments, children’s vitamens, you name it, its out there. Diet Coke is probably the most frequently consumed product on a consistant basis by consumers. A former boss and good friend of mine was notorious for his glass of ice and his bottomless can of Diet Coke on his desk at any given time. When he would come by my office every afternoon the first thing he would do after sitting his briefcase down in my office was head to the fridge to get a ice cold Diet Coke.  He had problems with headaches, vision issues and weight gain/loss just to name a few. A more recent boss and friend was never seen without her 32 ounce “to go” container of Diet Coke. She suffered from horrible migraine headaches that I feel sure were a result of her mass consumption of the diet drink. Numerious tests have been performed and found NutraSweet to cause brain tumors, cancer, blindness, diabetes, obesity, headaches, seizures, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, Multiple Sclerosis etc.  in laboratory animals. People have this common misconception that simply because the FDA puts their stamp of approval on a product and they can buy it freely that it must be safe but this just isn’t the case anymore. It is not about the science because there have been study after study proving beyond a shadow of a doubt Aspartame is toxic and can be deadly. It’s all about the politics/money. Aspartame was taken off the shelf until 1981 good ole Ronald Ragen took office and replaced the Commisioner of the FDA and once again Apartame was back in business and two years later it was approved for carbonated drinks. Senate hearing in 1987 did nothing to reverse the previous findings by the FDA even though the FDA had received over ten thousand complaints from consumers related to the health related issues surrounding Aspartame or NutraSweet E951. Do you own research if you should have any doubts or questions about Aspartme. There is tons of well documents reports and information available  for anyone who is willing to listen to the truth about artifical sweetners.

 

// <![CDATA[
document.writeln('’);
// ]]>

“GM Bacteria used to create deadly sweetener

 

(NaturalNews) The manufacturers of the most prevalent sweetener in the world have a secret, and it`s not a sweet one. Aspartame, an artificial sweetener found in thousands of products worldwide, has been found to be created using genetically modified (GM) bacteria. What`s even more shocking is how long this information has been known. A 1999 article by The Independent was the first to expose the abominable process in which aspartame was created. Ironically, the discovery was made around the same time as rich leaders around the globe met at the G8 Summit to discuss the safety of GM foods.

The 1999 investigation found that Monsanto, the largest biotech corporation in the world, often used GM bacteria to produce aspartame in their US production plants. The end result is a fusion between two of the largest health hazards to ever hit the food industry — artificial sweeteners and an array of genetically altered organisms. Both have led to large-scale debate, with aspartame being the subject of multiple congressional hearings and scientific criticism. Scientists and health advocates are not the only ones to speak out against aspartame, however. The FDA received a flurry of complaints from consumers using NutraSweet, a product containing aspartame. Since 1992, the FDA has stopped documenting reports on the subject.

The process in which aspartame is created involves combining an amino acid known as phenylalanine with aspartic acid. First synthesized in 1965, aspartame requires bacteria for the sole purpose of producing phenylalanine. Monsanto discovered that through genetically altering this bacteria, phenylalanine could be created much more quickly. In the report by The Independent, Monsanto openly admitted that their mutated bacteria is a staple in the creation process of aspartame.

“We have two strains of bacteria – one is traditionally modified and one is genetically modified,” said the source from Monsanto. “It’s got a modified enzyme. It has one amino acid different.”

Multiple studies have been conducted regarding genetic manipulation, with many grim conclusions. One study found that the more GM corn was fed to mice, the fewer babies they had. Another study, published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences, found that the organs that typically respond to chemical food poisoning were the first to encounter problems after subjects consumed GM foods. The same study also states that GM foods should not be commercialized.

“For the first time in the world, we’ve proven that GMO are neither sufficiently healthy nor proper to be commercialized. […] Each time, for all three GMOs, the kidneys and liver, which are the main organs that react to a chemical food poisoning, had problems,” indicated Gilles-Eric Seralini, an expert member of the Commission for Biotechnology Reevaluation.

Consumer groups are now curious as to whether or not other products secretly contain genetically modified ingredients. Due to the fact that the finished product`s DNA does not change when using genetically modified bacteria, it is hard to know for sure. With the FDA ruling against the labeling of GM salmon, it is becoming more of a challenge to determine whether or not a product contains GM ingredients. Consumers are voicing their opposition for GM ingredients going incognito, with the largest growing retail brand being GMO-free products.

“The public wants to know and the public has a right to know,” said Marion Nestle, a professor in the Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health Department at New York University.

Unveiling the secret process in which aspartame is created acts as yet another reminder to stay away from artificial sweeteners, and one should choose natural alternatives such as palm sugar, xylitol, or stevia.” via Brasscheck

 

Here are more links with information regarding Aspertame

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame

http://aspartame.mercola.com/

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/

The shocking new teaser from PRICELE$$ and Habitat Media!


http://vimeo.com/13717101

Do you dare witness the horrifying true story of an electoral system that turns our elected representatives into craven JUNKIES, mainlining corporate cash in a viscous cycle to feed their insatiable campaign coffers!

This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Credits:  Habitat Media